Harvard business reports (1930)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

592 HARVARD BUSINESS REPORTS sell to other theaters, and such information would be useful not only to all distributors but also to competitive exhibitors. While a percentage arrangement enabled the manager to minimize the element of risk involved in exhibiting pictures of unestablished merit, he believed the gamble was not greatly reduced, as the guaranty required was commonly about as high as the flat rental terms on the same picture would ordinarily be. Percentage buying, moreover, would prevent the buyer from capitalizing on his ability to select and buy pictures successfully. The manager preferred to purchase pictures at a flat rental. Competition among theaters in the vicinity required careful bargaining on his part in order to secure the best bargain from a number of alternative purchases. It was often profitable to purchase a group of pictures that had been shown previously in Brooklyn theaters and had thereby obtained exploitation. In other instances, first-run privileges outweighed the exploitation value and were worth a higher price. Some distributors favored flat rentals on their program pictures for two reasons. It was possible to secure more favorable terms by bargaining on a specified amount, and it was diflicult and expensive to check the box oflice receipts on a percentage contract. For special pictures previously roadshown in the larger cities, such distributors usually required a guaranty and percentage arrangement. The popularity of sound pictures led a number of distributors in the latter months of 1928 to sell such releases on a percentage arrangement. The manager of the Willard Theater was approached by a salesman of Perry Pictures, Incorporated,5 for a contract to exhibit one of the new sound picture releases. The salesman stated that it was the policy of his company to sell the picture only on a guaranty and percentage arrangement. Three arrangements were being offered to exhibitors in booking the picture. The first plan called for a guaranty to the distributor equal to the theater's average film rental for the current year on all pictures and, in addition, two percentage divisions of the receipts over and above the average receipts of such pictures. The percentage divisions requested by the distributor were: 50% of the first 5 Fictitious name.