Hearings regarding the communist infiltration of the motion picture industry. Hearings before the Committee on Un-American Activities, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, first session. Public law 601 (section 121, subsection Q (1947)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

COMMUNISM IN MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY 141 varyin<r (le<iree and a lesser (U'<iree of viojilance — or realization, which 1 think is a better \vor(l — has been shown by other studios. However, since I testified in Los An<2;eles this s])rin^, I am happy to say there has been a <j;rowin<j; awareness in the motion-picture industry of the menace of communism; that it has been fought in all the unions and the guilds, and successfully in most of them. Mr. Smith. As an executive at Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, what do you think about the condition there? Mr. McCiuiNNESs. I don't think it is the whitest condition in the industry. I think we have our share of Communists in our employ. Mr. Smith. You stated you feel it has been successfully combated in the guilds. Is that your opinion as to the Screen Writers Guild? Mr. McCtuinness. I (qualified that by saying some of the guilds. I do not believe it has been successfully combated in the Screen Writers (xuild. There is a group in the guild now attempting to organize and to )iresent at a forthcoming election a slate of candidates opposed to comnumism. Mr. Smith. Mr. McGuinness, do you know who Alvah Bessie is? Mr. McGuinness. Yes. Mr. Smith. Who is he? Mr. McGuinness. Alvah Bessie is a former movie critic of the New Masses who came to Hollywood, I think — yes, in the employ of Warner Bros. He was known amongst writers I knew on the Warner Bros, lot as the party's hatchet man. Mr. Smith. Do you consider the New Masses a Communist publication? Mr. Mc(iuiNNEss. I do. Mr. Smith. If a studio releases a person who is suspected of comnumistic activities w^ould be be blackballed in other studios? Mr. McGuinness. No. Mr. Smith. AVhat would happen, in your opinion? Mr. McGuinness. Hitherto he has usually been promptly hired and sometimes, or perhaps frequently, at an increased salary. Mr. S3HTH. Do you think that is a bad situation in the industry? Mr. McGuinness. I would like to answer that a little at length. I Ijidieve there is no legal obligation on anybody to hire anybody, nor is there any legal com]:)ulsi<)n on anybody to tire anybody. I would regret that any man was deprived of his livelihood for his political opinions no matter ]\n\^ abhorrent those opinions are to me. I think, however, there is an obligation on the Congress of the United States as greafor greater than on the citizens, who have sworn to defend this country against all its enemies, foreign or domestic, to recogiuze that we have in our midst an active tiftli column, a group of Quislings who intend to destroy our form of government in the service of a foreign ideology. • Mr. Smith. How many writers would you think the industry would lose; that is, top-flight writers, if all the Communist writers were released? Mr. Mc(tuinness. Among the important writers, that is, the actually to})-flight writers, somewhere between 10 and 15. Mr. Smith. How many pictures a year do you think the studios would lose ^ 67683—47 10