Hearings regarding the communist infiltration of the motion picture industry. Hearings before the Committee on Un-American Activities, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, first session. Public law 601 (section 121, subsection Q (1947)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

470 COMMUNISM IN MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY Mr. Stripling. I would like you to answer again for the committee how long you have been associated with RKO-Keiths. Mr. SciiARY. I have been associated with them as an executive sJJice January 1, 1947. Before that time I was on kind of a lend-lease arrangement between David Selznick and RKO. We had a profitsharing agreement on some films and I was loaned out by Mr. Selznick toRKO. Mr. Stripling. Mr. Schary , are you acquainted with Hanns Eisler ? Mr. Schary. I know him. Mr. Stripling. Did you ever employ Hanns Eisler ? Mr. Schary. No. He was employed at the studio shortly after I got there. His employment was not made by me. Mr. Stripling. Could you tell the committee who did employ Hanns Eisler? Mr. Schary. You want to know the actual chain of events about that? Mr. Stripling. That is right. Mr. Schary. He is employed — technically a man assigned to music is employed by two people, one of them a Mr. Dakalienokoff. He is in charge of music. He arranges for the employment of musicians assigned to score films, and a Mr. Leon Goldberg, who is the comptroller of the studio. Mr. Stripling. Have you ever heard that Hanns Eisler was a Communist ? Mr. Schary. I did not hear it until the recent investigations. Mr. Stripling. Mr. Eisler — this committee held liearings on Hanns Eisler for 3 days, and I think the committee submitted volinuinous evidence showing that Mr. -Eisler had been engaged in Communist activities for many years; that he was the head of the International Music Bureau with headquarters in the Soviet Union; that he had engaged in various cultural or musical activities in the United States which had as their purpose the undermining of our system of gov>;rnment. I believe it was brought out at the hearing that Mr. Eisler received $26,000 for various scores whicli he had written for RKO-Keiths. Now, as an executive of RKO-Keiths, what is the policy of your company with regard to the employment of people who are notoriously international Communists ? Mr. Schary. That policy, I imagine, will have to be determined by tlie president, by the board, and by myself. I can tell you personally what I feel. Up until the time it is proved that a Communist is a man dedicated to the overthrow of the Government by force or violence, or by any illegal methods, I cannot make any determination of his employment on any otlier basis except whether he is qualified best to do the job I want him to do. Mr. Stripling. If Mv. Eisler, himself, stated in writing that he was working for the overthrow of this Government by force and violence, would that be sufficient evidence for you? Mr. Schary. That would be ; yes, sir. Mr. Stripling. I will give you a copy of the hearings with the evidence in them Mr. Schary. Yes, sir. Mr. Stripling. And ask that you read them. Mr. Schary. Yes, sir.