Hearings regarding the communist infiltration of the motion picture industry. Hearings before the Committee on Un-American Activities, House of Representatives, Eightieth Congress, first session. Public law 601 (section 121, subsection Q (1947)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

COMMUNISM IN MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY 473 Mr. Stripling, There is an exact similarity, isn't there? Mr. SciiARY. As I say, I liave noticed there has been that. Mr. Stripling. Yon conldn't give the committee any deviations from it, could you, exact deviations? Mr. ScHARY. Not to my knowledge ; no. Mr. Stripling. Now, are Mr. Scott and Mr. Dmytryk, who preceded you, employed in your studio? Mr. ScHARY. Yes ; they are under contract. Mr. Stripling. You heard them refuse to answer the question whether or not they are members of the Communist Party, did you not ? Mr. ScHARY. Yes, sir. Mr. Stripling. Will you continue to employ them? Mr. ScHARY. They are under contracts to RKO. They were employed by RKO before I came there. My association with both Mr. Scott and Mr. Dmytryk has been very professional. As an executive I have consulted with them on films, t can only say this, Mr. Stripling, I do not know what these men in their minds are pledged to. It would come to me as a very terrible shock if I found out that these charges being made here in terms of their being foreign agents are true. That would come to me genuinely as a very surprised shock, but I must say, not in defense but in honesty, that at no time in discussions have I ever heard — or films — these men make any remarks or attempt to get anything subversive into the films I have worked on with them. I must say that in honesty. Mr. Stripling. Well, INIr. Schary, you saw them here this afternoon given every opportunity to answer the questions Mr. Schary. Yes, sir. Mr. Stripling. Whether or not they were ever a member of the Communist Party. Mr. Schary. That is right, sir. Mr. Stripling. You have heard the investigator for this committee read the name, date, number, and place of their Communist membership. Mr. Schary. That is right, sir. Mv. Stripling. There has been no denial from these two gentlemen. ISIr. Schary. That is right, sir. I can perhaps disagree with their method of answering this question. I must say that there probably remains some area of doubt about their right to answer that way. I personally would disagree with their method. Mr. Stripling. Now, have you employed at your studio a person by the name of Bertholcl Brecht ? Mr. Schary. Repeat that, please ? Mr. Stripling. Berthold Brecht, B-e-r-t-h-o-l-cl B-r-e-c-h-t. Mr. Schary. No, sir ; I never have. Mr. Stripling. He has never been employed at RKO ? Mr. Schary. No, sir ; not while I have been there, not that I know of ; no, sir. Mr. Stripling. Getting back to Mr. Eisler again, Mr. Schary. If Mr. Eisler, as one who had taken out citizenship papers in the United States, were to send a cablegram to a foreign government in which he quotes : It gives us courage in the struggle and binds us to give all our strength in the defense of the Soviet Union.