Heinl news service (July-Dec 1948)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Heinl Radio News Service 11/17/48 RADIO STATIONS PILE CONTEMPT CASE ANSV/ERS Pour of five Baltimore area radio stations cited for con~ tempt for handling of nev/s concerning the Eugene James murder case have now filed answers to the charges, according to an Associated Press report Monday, November 15* The latest reply, from Station WITH and its News Editor James P, Connolly, charges the controversial Baltimore court rule under which the stations were held in contempt is unconstitutional* Supreme bench Rule 904 prohibits publication or broadcast of information about an accused man if the information is obtained betv/een the time of his arrest and the time of his trial* ¥/ITH and Connolly contended that James, who was sentenced last week to b e hanged for the knife-slaying of ll-year old Marsha Brill, was not in custody of the court at the time the alleged con¬ tempt v/as committed* They said the information they broadcast after James was arrested was obtained by telephone from a ’’responsible public offic¬ ial” at 7 P.M., July 8* James, they claimed,, was not formally charg¬ ed until 45 minutes later* In addition, they contended the alleged offense did not con¬ stitute a ’’clear and present danger • • , to the impartial administr¬ ation of justice”; that Supreme Bench Rule 904 violates the declara¬ tion of rights and is a restrain on publication, that the rule is discriminatory* In previous replies, WPBR and WCBM called the rule vague and indefinite and a violation of freedom of the press* XXXXXXXXXXXX DECLINE IN CUBANS RADIO IMPORTS Cuban imports of radio receivers during the first 8 months of 1948 totaled 56,275 units valued at fpl,497,914, compared with 90,303 units valued at ^^2,637,932 during the corresponding period of 1947, Of the total imported in the 1948 period, 55,546 sets were from the United States and 729 were from European sources, the U* S, Commerce Department reports* The decline in imports ¥/as caused principally by the receipt of large numbers of 5 and 6-tube models in 1947, according to trade sources* Normal annual requirements for receiving sets are estimated at about 35,000 units, but the trade estimates that a maximum of 50,000 new units can be marketed in extraordinarily good years the average import rate per year in 1946, 1947, and 1948 (the latter bas¬ ed on data for the first 8 months) was roughly 100,000 sets, A drastic price reduction on present stocks is reportedly contemplated in order to step up sales and gradually permit the importation of newer models* XXXXXXXX