Heinl news service (Jan-June 1948)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

January 7, 1948 WATERED RADIO LIQUOR AD BAN SEEN EVEN IF CAPPER DEFEATED Apparently whether or not Senator Arthur Capper (R), years-old, of Kansas, is defeated for re-election, some kind of a curb is almost certain to be applied to newspaper, magazine and radio liquor advertising. It may even be put on during the session of Congress which has just convened and before Senator Capper’s term expires at the end of this session. o ^ which Mr, Capper has been introducing into the Senate for the past 20 years to bar interstate advertising of alco¬ holic beverages by press or radio was shelved last session by a Senate Interstate Commerce subcommittee and a softer measure sub¬ stituted which, however, still leaves the distillers unhappy. ^ proposed new bill would enumerate types of copy which would not be permitted to be sent over State lines', or, in tL limit¬ ed circumstances where the offense could be committed orally to be broadcast. * The new approach, distillers say, would limit them to publication of a business card, rob copy of its and by making the appeal relatively unproductive render advertising almost useless. xcnuex thnt suggested by the Interstate Commerce subcommittee h t It IS impractical to offer the Capper measure with its outright bat somf confidence warexpressef nr tho° enact a less stringent bill embodying^proposals of the committee members Senators Clyde M. Reed and Edwin TnVm L°p;bi?:"ns."IeS:[^rLor naws;:pef puSeS; P i cans, Senator Johnson, a Democrat, is a Colorado rancher. Hearings on the Capper Bill were held last May. ”We find” the subcommittee said in summation, "that an extensive campaign on * the psrt of ^ the liquor interests is being carried on especially through periodicals using colors in their advertising pages, un a view of conveying the idea especially to young people that the consumption of liquor is ’smart’.” drafts of a bill were submitted. Each would ed^fnr^m»mr Commission supervision to the surveillance practio years by the Alcohol Tax Unit of the Treasury DepartredL; ?? overlapping which distillers say would further tend to duariurlsdio?ioL >^“b®rtainties of The essential part of the first draft states: ov, TT V the case of all alcoholic beverage an advertisement shall be deemed misleading in a material respect if in such adver¬ tisement representations are made or suggested by statement, word. 1