Heinl radio business letter (July-Dec 1934)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

7/20/34 RADIO WHOLESALE TRADE SUBMITS CODE BUDGET The Divisional Code Authority for the Radio Wholesaling Trade, a division of the Wholesaling or Distributing Trade, has made application uo the Administrator for approval of its budget for 1934, and of the basis of contribution by members of the trade, to the expenses of administering the Code for the period from May 1, 1934, to April 30, 1935. The total amount of the budget for the period is $79,994. The Code Authority has likewise submitted an applica¬ tion for the termination of the exemption conferred whereby members of its trade whose principal line of business is embraced in a trade or industry subject to a Code other than the Code for the trade were exempted from obligation to contribute to the expense of Code administration for the trade. XXXXXXXX WOULD PERMIT MASSACHUSETTS STATION TO MOVE It has been recommended to the Federal Communications Commission by Examiner Ralph L. Walker that Albert S. Moffat be authorized to move Station WLEY from its present location at Lexington, Mass. , to Lowell, Mass. , without change of operat¬ ing assignment. Examiner ’Walker's conclusion in the case follows: "Lexington, Massachusetts, the present location of Station WLEY, now receives consistently satisfactory service from several stations located elsewhere, while Lowell, Mass., and vicinity, does not receive consistently satisfactory service from any existing station. It appears, therefore, that there is a greater need for the services of WLEY in Lowell than in Lexington. From a commercial viewpoint, Lowell affords greater opportunity for the successful operation of Station WLEY. The applicant is qualified in all respects to construct and operate the station at the new location and to render the service needed in that area. "While under average conditions it would be expected that the operation of WLEY at Lowell would result in objection¬ able interference with other stations, it appears from the evi~. dence that actual conditions of propagation are less than average and that Station WLEY can be operated in the proposed location without causing objectionable interference to existing stations. XXXXXXXX 6