Heinl radio business letter (July-Dec 1940)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

10/18/40 MONOPOLY REPORT ARGUMENT PUT OVER UNTIL AFTER ELECTION Oral argument in connection with the investigation by the Federal Communications Commission of chain broadcasting will be held on Tuesday, December 2, and Wednesday, December 3. The subject matter for argument will be limited to the issues of fact and policy raised by the report of the chain broadcasting committee dated June 12, 1940. It was further announced that at the request of inter¬ ested parties, the final date for the filing of briefs would be extended to November 11, 1940. XXXXXXXXXX NO PAY FOR VOLUNTEER RADIO PERFORMERS Col. Phillip B. Fleming, Administrator of the Wage and Hour Law has ruled that persons who appear voluntarily on such programs as ”Man on the Street” and "Quiz Game” broadcasts are not employees of the radio stations within the meaning of the law. The instructions were issued relative to an order of Sept. 16 relating to sustaining radio programs because of a mis¬ understanding of its scope and the receipt of many inquiries. XXXXXXXX c ORRECTION In quoting from the Senate transcript in the article "Tobey Forces Brown to Qpit", in our issue of October 15th, the following was inadvertently attributed to Commissioner T. A. M. Craven ; »* * # I heard a discussion, apparently coming from the direction where Mr. Brown was sitting; and I noticed that, as a result of that, he was holding the lady's wrist and I was holding it so as to prevent her from apparently attacking him in some form; because she seemed to be rather angry, as a result of the discussion. ” This was incorrect. What Commander Craven really said was; "I heard a discussion, apparently coming from the direc¬ tion where Mr. Brown was sitting; and I noticed that, as a result of that, he was holding the lady's wrist and was holding it so as to prevent her from apparently attacking him, in some form; because she seemed to be rather angry, as a result of the discus¬ sion. " As stated in article, though Commander Craven was in the Club^that night along with Commissioner Case and others, he was not in Colonel Brown's immediate party. XXXXXXXX