Heinl radio business letter (July-Dec 1943)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

12/17/43 informed of a change in ownership in 1936, but had taken no action. FCC rules require notification of any change in ownership or oper¬ ation. LAr. Lafount, Mr. Garey said, first acquired stock in 193y and by 1941 had control. Edgar L. Brown, President of the National Negro Council, sougnt to have a provision of the Radio law prohibit the broadcast¬ ing ”of terms of opprobrium toward any race, creed or color”, Luigi Antonini, President of the ItalianAmerican Labor Council complained that stations were dropping foreign language broadcasts and thus rejecting radio as a means of Americanization. XXXXXXXXXX FCC DISCRIMINATION IN PRESS WIRELESS CASE IS DENIED Armed with another lengthy statement this one was 19 pages James L. Fly, Chairman of the Federal Communications Commis¬ sion, answered shot for shot the charges Josenh Pierson, President of Press Wireless, Inc., had made to the Senate Interstate Commerce Committee that his company had been discriminated against by the FCC. Mr. Fly said, in part: "Mackay and R, C, A. Communications have been denied more apolications than Press Wireless. * * ”In his testimony Mr, Pierson stated that the bulk of the business between Algiers and the United States is press traffic. The figures do not bear this out. For example, for the month of March 1943 the first month during which the Algiers circuit vms in oper¬ ation the total press traffic handled over the .Algiers circuit, both inbound and outbound, was 97 messages with a total of 9,284 words. This compares with a grand total for the circuit for the month of March of 494 messages and 34,053 words. During subsequent raontiis the proportion of press to other traffic has risen but it still remains true that non-press traffic constitutes a substantial portion of the traffic over the Algiers circuit. ”I have a table here wnlch siio^^s for the period from the opening of the Algiers circuit to Septemoer 30, 1943, the latest date for which figures are available the percentage of total traf¬ fic, both inbound and outbound, in terms of messages, words, and revenues, respectively, devoted to press, government, expeditionary force messages, and regular commercial messages. ”Mr. Pierson criticizes the Commission for acting on applications for these temporary licenses without a hearing. This criticism is without merit. Tne Commission has found it necessary to issue temporary licenses without a hearing because the exigencies of war will not wait while prolonged hearings are held to determine whether authorizations should be issued. Mr. Pierson, himself, with Justifiable pride, told this Committee how Press Wireless was able 9