Heinl radio business letter (Jan-June 1935)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Washington, D. C. ~:AiT — rwEf 2400 California Street 'J d, @ U 0 W \e nil ,i:li .«». Q / ipo \X}h |* c| January 22, 1935, B U Ij L E T I N FCC AGAINST RELIGIOUS EDUCATIONAL FIXED PERCENTAGES The Federal Communications Commission late this (Tuesday) afternoon submitted its long-awaited report to Congress on the highly controversial question of whether or not religious and educational stations shall be specifically provided for by law. The answer is contained in the following recommendation, and it is "No": "The Federal Communications Commission recomends that at this time no fixed percentages of radio broadcast facilities be allocated by statute to particular types or kinds of non¬ profit radio programs or to persons identified with particular types or kinds of non-profit activities. " The Commission, however, proposes to hold a conference of non-profit (educational and religious) and commercial broad¬ casters at an early date in Washington to "the end of combining the educational experience of the educators with the program technique of the broadcasters, thereby better to serve the public interest", and to consider any specific complaints and whatever remedial measures should be taken. At the same time the Commission submitted the educationalreligious report, they also made two other recommendations to Congress (a) a substitute for the so-called "Davis Amendment", which allocated equal radio facilities to all parts of the country, and (b) that a chief accountant and not more than three assistants be added to the Commission's staff, the Chief to receive $9,000, and the Assistants, $7,500. In giving their reasons for vetoing the proposal that fixed percentages of radio facilities be allocated to religious and educational stations, the Commission said, "There is no need for a change in the existing law to accomplish the helpful purposes of the proposal. "Flexibility in the provisions of the law is essential to regulation if growth and development in the art of broadcasting is to be encouraged and regulated for the best interests of the