Heinl radio business letter (Jan-June 1940)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

5/28/40 "Much time has been given to pro grains by educ8,tional institutions. And this makes possible the effective work of studios such as this of the University of North Carolina. "One ofyour problems is to devise programs and methods of presentation which will reach actual listeners, A possible listening public is not sufficient. But, into these questions as to particular programs and techniques, I shall not intrude. It is of greatest importance as a matter of work done here shall be designed fairly and mote the informational needs of the people, cause of democracy is served. ” principle that the effectively to proIn that way, the xxxxxxxxx MINNESOTA UNITES IN FIGHTING WNYC APPLICATION The State of Minnesota, including its Congressional delegation, opened a fight this week before the Federal Communica¬ tions Commission against the application of Station WNYC, New York, for authority to operate at night on 810 kc. , which it now shares with WCCO, Minneapolis. Protest against the application for extension filed by WNYC was presented at the opening of the FCC hearing by Alfred W. Bowen, special counsel representing J, A. A. Burnquist, attorney of Minnesota, and supported by Representatives Andre sen, Youngdahl Anderson and Knutson, all of Minnesota. The legislators attended the hearing. Each Minnesota Representative entered an objection to "anything that will impair the efficiency of WCCO", Mr. Knutson reinforced his protest with a warning that "we will not take lying down" any decision favoring New York City at the expense of the area served by the Biinneapolis station. "We have intervened as much for the benefit of remote listeners beyond the borders of our State as for the people of Minnesota", Mr. Bowen, speaking for Attorney General Burnquist, told R. H. Hyde, FCC Examiner. He said the station employed "the only clear channel in the entire area embracing the four States of Minnesota, Wisconsin, North Dakota and South Dakota. " "Listeners in New York", he went on, now have a choice among some twentythree local radio stations, including three clear channels. Throughout the great area served by WCCO, many people can hear clearly only that station. It would seem in¬ equitable to add to this existing greater choice in New York by depriving millions of people in the area we represent of the only major station they can hear clearly. 8