Heinl radio business letter (July-Dec 1941)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

8/15/41 CROSLEY REPORTS NEW STEEL PROCESS The Crosley Corporation of Cincinnati has announced development of a process whereby ordinary steel may be substituted for aluminum and special alloy steel in certain airplane parts with no added weight and in some cases a slight saving. Lewis M. Clement, engineering director, said the process was being used on Army Air Corps contract work. Essentially, he said, it is a method of joining pieces of shaped steel so that they have the same strength as aluminum die castings or chrome molybdenum steel forgings in certain bearing assemblies. The weight saving results from the smaller size of the steel pieces needed as compared with the aluminum or chrome molybdeniun. xxxxxxxx NATIONAL INTEREST INVENTIONS BILL Aim^DED The following amendment was added to the Bill (H. R. 4784) to amend the act relating to preventing the publication of inven¬ tions in the national interest: *^Sec. 5. Whoever, during the period or periods of time an invention has been ordered to be kept secret and the grant of a patent thereon withheld pursuant to the act approved July 1, 1940, (Public No» 700, 76th Cong. 3d sess., ch. 501), shall, with know¬ ledge of such order and without due authorization, willfully publish or disclose or authorize or cause to be published or disclosed such invention, or any material information with respect thereto, or whoever in violation of the provisions of section 3 hereof, shall file or cause or authorize to be filed in any foreign country an application for patent or for the registration of a utility model, industrial design, or model in respect of any invention ma„de in the United States, shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than 2 years, or both, xxxxxxxxxx The Commission is unable to help a New Yorker who claLms bis invention '•for the development of music” has been suppressed by certain business interests. Md the only thing the Commission can do with a sample of corn remover sent to it is to turn it over to the Federal Trade Commission, to which it should have been addressed, xxxxxxxxxx 12