A history of the movies (1931)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CHAPTER FIVE THE STAR SYSTEM I HE independents, lacking at the start the effective organization and large revenues of the trust, and handicapped constantly by the fierce litigation and smashing tactics of their opponents, nevertheless had one great advantage over the ten licensed manufacturers of the patents company — the "outlaws" were free to try all experiments that promised to please the public, while the trust producers were restricted by the footage-royalty system under which they operated. The men at the head of the patents company had organized their enterprise in accordance with the best practices of mass production. Their conception of the desires and needs of the film-consuming public was good merchandise, of standard, reliable quality, manufactured in large quantities, and retailed at low prices. Confident they had assured the production of reliable quality, by the inclusion in the corporation of all capable manufacturers, they expected regularity and stability in their business. "Novel and ingenious films" would come regularly from the factories, and would be delivered promptly and in good condition to the exhibitors, who would pay reasonable, standardized rentals; audiences would see good shows for a nickel (later the trust modified its viewpoint to embrace a dime, but never more than a dime); the public would be pleased, exhibitors would 83