A history of the movies (1931)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

THE STAR SYSTEM 93 unconsciously achieved its first great victory over all film rulers, and encouraged by this triumph it inspired many remarkable advances in its own form of entertainment within the next few years. Each forward step was won over the great obstacles erected by the conservatism of most manufacturers, distributors, and theater owners. Screen entertainment had been fixed, apparently permanently, on the system of a program of assorted subjects providing an hour or two hours of exhibition, and the maximum length of any one item seemed to be anchored at one reel (twelve to fifteen minutes). Here and there, throughout the country, a few exhibitors, keeping closely in touch with patrons, insisted that sections of their audiences were reaching out for something better. In the studios were men who knew that carefully developed stories, presented by selected casts of players, with intelligent direction and good settings, would result in pictures whose quality would be superior to that possible in one-reel films; two reels would accomplish much and three reels would permit great advance. But production of these longer, better films would materially increase manufacturing expenses. The standard cost of one-reel negatives was fifty cents to a dollar a foot, or five hundred to a thousand dollars; two-reelers might add fifty cents or more per foot, and three-reelers might cost two dollars or more. As the earnings of pictures were definitely limited by the daily change of program, standard price system, under which one reel was the maximum possibility, trust producers who wanted to experiment with longer forms were pretty sure to lose money, if, indeed, they could succeed in persuading General Film to release the long picture. The length of a picture was itself an obstacle of real importance. Exchanges and theaters alike were organized on a one-reel basis; a change to two reels would necessitate important modifications in business methods and exhibiting practices. And, moreover, most men in the industry were firmly committed to the belief that anything longer than a dozen minutes on the screen would throw such a burden on the mental capacity of