A history of the movies (1931)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

THE STAR SYSTEM 95 amusement, the better quality of two-reels soon brought about lines of demarcation, and theaters began to be classified by movie patrons and by exhibitors themselves. As the production of two-reelers was more expensive than the making of two single reels, the rental prices of these better films were advanced considerably beyond the former scale. Many exhibitors — the majority of them — objecting strenuously to the higher rentals, clung to the programs of one-reel and split-reel, and permitted progressive houses to obtain the first showings of two-reelers. This minority of advancing showmen — usually located "downtown" or in neighborhoods where a large population could be drawn upon — made two-reelers the backbone of their program, filling in with shorter subjects. Presently they were attracting to their theaters such an important proportion of patronage that they were able to raise the admittance price from ten cents to fifteen, and here and there to twenty. And, too, they acquired the reputation of showing "first-class" pictures, while, by inference at least, other houses began to be marked as "second class." Events soon proved that millions of the movie multitude had grown very alert, very quick to appreciate improvement in storytelling and to differentiate sharply in selection of player personalities. By giving their patronage to the theaters that presented first-class pictures, this vanguard in the movie army forced backward exhibitors into accepting two-reelers, and the conservative rulers of General Film, to meet the competition of independents, modified the trust's system far enough to permit the distribution of two-reelers as part of the standard program. However, when audiences and exhibitors demanded three-reelers, General Film refused flatly to permit any farther encroachment on standardization, and three-reelers were not included in the program. During these gold-rush years of confusion and strife of manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers — years of frenzied compe