The history of three-color photography (1925)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Still Cameras and Chromoscopes 125 being the lens 3, the transparent mirrors 5 and 12, the back 6 of the former being colored rose or rose-violet, and the back 13 of the latter being coated with red; 9 and 10 were silvered opaque mirrors, which reflected the images to a1, bl, a and b, and the image a2, b'1 would be formed, as shown by the dotted lines, but the path was shortened by the interposition of the lens 18. E. Sanger-Shepherd38 patented a one-lens camera, Fig. 40, with a sliding carriage e, in which were three apertures, as shown in 3, and be --V Fig. 39. Sellc's E.P. 12,514, 1899. hind g and % were mirrors k, I, which reflected the image respectively to c and c2, in front of which were the filters d, d. When the aperture h was opposite the lens the image would be formed on the plate c1 through its filter d. The carriage was rapidly reciprocated by the cam m, which might be controlled with any convenient motive power ; p, p were the partitions forming separate chambers for the plates. If the images were all re