The history of three-color photography (1925)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

462 History of Three-Color Photography of the distance at which the object is viewed, can be fairly well differentiated. The author pointed out18 that ScherTer's arguments were based on the use of black and white screens, and that the same might not apply to colored units. The following experiments were made: cinematograph film was slit lengthwise and stained red, green and blue, so that the absorptions were approximately the same as in screen-plates. Strips of the dyed film were stuck on gelatinized glass to form a linear screen, and this placed against a window covered with tissue paper. The plate was first placed with the lines running horizontally, then so that they were at an angle of 45 degrees. Seven observers and the author then determined quite independently at what distance the lines became invisible, with the following results: server =5 45° M Ba. 38,400 30,480 25,300 O* 20,420 15,545 16,460 F. 38,400 26,820 26,820 K. 24,690 27,430 16,150 Bu. 34,440 34,440 19,810 Y. 38,400 27,430 27,430 M. 33,530 25,910 21,030 W. 38,400 30,840 19,810 ♦Suffered from red blindness. The second column gives the distance in millimeters at which the horizontal lines became indistinguishable; the third column the distances for the lines at 45 degrees, and the fourth for a mosaic screen. This was made as follows : strips of the same dyed film were cut into small rectangles 13x17.4 mm. These were placed alternately in rows with their longer axes vertical, and so that under every red there wras a blue, and so on, the result being that rectangles of the same color were at an angle of approximately 37 degrees. SchefTer has shown that the resolving power of the eye is of such an order that it will see lines as separate, if their "period" (twice their separating distance for lines equal in width to the spaces) is one-thousandth of their distance from the eye. From the above it is clear that the units of the above linear screen should have become invisible at 52,000 mm. when the lines were horizontal and at an angle of 45 degrees. In the case of the mosaic screen a rectangle was taken that would include four units and the diagonal measured, this was 41 mm. ; therefore the units of this screen should have become invisible at 123,000 mm. The following table shows the difference between theory and practice : = 45° M Theory 52,000 52,200 123,000 Practical mean 30,834 27,692 21,000 It is apparent from this that one can not apply the arguments of a black and white screen to colors. It very soon became apparent in the