"How I did it," ([c1922])

Record Details:

Title:
"How I did it,"
Date:
[c1922]
Publisher:
Los Angeles, Calif. : The Whittingham press
Volume:
"How I did it,"
Leaf #:
00027
Language:
English
Collection:
Books
Format:
Books
Contributor:
University of California Libraries
Sponsor:
MSN
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Date Added:
July 19, 2022
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

"flow / Did It age when he will come into his own. In the future the story is going to be the thing. Everything else will be of lesser importance. It should have been so from the very begin- ning, and would have been, had the producer been willing to admit the importance of the story. But he found to his regret, many times, that the biggest star and the best di- rector were not able to make great pictures from poor material. He also discovered it is possible for a good story to "make" a star or director. In other words, the producer has learned that no man can do good work with a poor kit of tools. In the past, the producer has not smiled kindly on the original writer, or photodrama- tist. For several years he refused to recog- nize the importance of the original story, or photoplay, and was content to purchase screen rights to books, novels, plays and short stories. Now and then he dipped into the classics. In those days the screen writer was poorly equipped and poorly paid. He re- ceived no recognition either from the pro- ducer or public. He was looked upon as the