"How I did it," ([c1922])

Record Details:

Title:
"How I did it,"
Date:
[c1922]
Publisher:
Los Angeles, Calif. : The Whittingham press
Volume:
"How I did it,"
Leaf #:
00031
Language:
English
Collection:
Books
Format:
Books
Contributor:
University of California Libraries
Sponsor:
MSN
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Date Added:
July 19, 2022
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

"How I Did It short stories, and in their delirious attempt to outdo their competitors the producers paid enormous prices for permission to reproduce these works on the screen. Soon they discov- ered they had made a mistake, and millions of dollars were spent before they learned that screen writing is a separate profession and requires a special kind of work. Novelists and playwrights rushed to gather in some of the big money. Some of them made great efforts to become photoplay- wrights. They soon discovered that photo- playwriting is different from all other forms of literary work. They were weighed in the balance and found wanting. They had scoffed and sneered at the screen in its youth and had refused to take it seriously, with the result that the screen, meantime, had progressed and proved that instead of being a temporary fad, it had come to stay. Meantime, the screen writer had plugged along conservatively and consistently. He spent more time in writing his stories, and the price of his creations consistently rose be- cause they represented more care, time and 10