The Independent Film Journal (1955)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

^ TV I 1$ POLL LUHCHI li^TS July 23. V •lass matter October 2SriS^, at the t, N, Y., under the act of March aekly by The ITOA IndependeaU iWew York -36, Soi> ig Ye^. :^aqiB cop^r^O ioehta. FOR WHOM THE POLES TOLL IF any reputable and unbiased statistician was com¬ missioned to chart a graph reflecting the present trend of public opinion with respect to pay-asyou-see television, the results would unmistakably demonstrate a definite swing against this controvers¬ ial medium. It should be remembered that initial responses to the FCC inquiries were predominantly in favor of Toll TV until the issue was joined and debated and the public got a clearer picture of its status in the event that this medium became a reality. Just how far this swing has gone would be pure conjecture on our part but there are indications that it has been quite substantial — enough to frighten the proponents of Toll TV into a change in their party line. fSee Page 3) 1., ^