In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants (1913)

Record Details:

Title:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants
Date:
1913
Publisher:
New York, Appeal Printing Co.
Volume:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 1
Leaf #:
000596
Language:
English
Collection:
Government & Law and Early Cinema
Format:
Periodicals
Contributor:
The Museum of Modern Art Library, New York
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
These seven volumes contain the testimonies and supporting documents from the U.S. District Court's antitrust lawsuit against the Motion Picture Patents Company (MPPC). Formed in 1908, the MPPC (sometimes referred to asœ"the Edison Trust" or just "the Trust") sought to control the American film industry through pooling patents and demanding that producers and exhibitors acquire licenses to those patents. Independent producers and exhibitors, who refused to license the patents, argued that the MPPC was an unlawful monopoly. In 1912 and 1913, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania heard testimonies from both MPPC members, such as Siegmund Lubin, and "Independents" who later became Hollywood moguls, such as William Fox. Ultimately, in 1915, the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which found the MPPC in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and spelled the end for the already weakening MPPC. -- Eric Hoyt, 2012
Date Added:
May 23, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

570 Gov't Ex. 133, Agt. Edison & Eastman Kodak Cos. 1 for non-perforated "Licensed Filru" (having a nitrocellulose base) approximately one inch and three-eighths of an inch (1% in.) in width, and three and one-quarter (3%) cents net per running foot for perforated "Licensed Film" (having a nitrocellulose base) approximately one inch and three-eighths of an inch (1% in.) in width, which prices shall be reduced or increased in proportion to the reduction or increase in width of narrower or wider "Licensed Film" than that approximately one inch and three-eighths of an inch (1% in.) in width. 18. It is further mutually covenanted and agreed by and between the Patents Company and the Eastman Company, that on each sale of "Licensed Film" to the "Patents Company licensees ' (with the exception of the Edison Company), the Eastman Company shall, in the first instance, that is to say, when such "Licensed Film" approximately one inch and three-eighths of an inch (1% in.) in width, is billed and shipped by it, charge the licensees with its price of three (3) cents or three and one-quarter (SV4) cents, as the case may be, per running foot, plus o the maximum royalty of five (5) mills per running foot, referred to in Paragraph 6 of this agreement, and on the expiration of each year, counting from June 20, 1909, shall adjust the royalty account of each licensee as to "Licensed Film" so billed and shipped to them and paid for by them, according to the royalty schedule set forth in said Paragraph 6, returning to the licensee any amount such licensee may have overpaid, according to said schedule, and paying the balance to the Patents Company; and that on eacli sale of the other film of a width approximately one inch and three-eighths of an inch (1% in.) in width to the 4 amount of two and one-half (21/o) per cent, of the total amount of "Licensed Film" supplied to the "Patents Company licensees" during any one year, counting from June 20, 1909, of the continuance of this agreement, as provided for in Paragraph 14, a royalty of one-half (%■) cent, per running foot, and which royalty the Eastman Company is to pay to the Patents Company on such film sold by it which is paid for by the purchaser thereof; and on each sale of said other film which is not to exceed approximately one inch (1 in.) in width, as provided for in Paragraph 11, the Eastman Company shall include in the price charged