In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants (1913)

Page scan 000599 from In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants

Record Details:

Title:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants
Date:
1913
Publisher:
New York, Appeal Printing Co.
Volume:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 1
Leaf #:
000599
Language:
English
Collection:
Government & Law and Early Cinema
Format:
Periodicals
Contributor:
The Museum of Modern Art Library, New York
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
These seven volumes contain the testimonies and supporting documents from the U.S. District Court's antitrust lawsuit against the Motion Picture Patents Company (MPPC). Formed in 1908, the MPPC (sometimes referred to asœ"the Edison Trust" or just "the Trust") sought to control the American film industry through pooling patents and demanding that producers and exhibitors acquire licenses to those patents. Independent producers and exhibitors, who refused to license the patents, argued that the MPPC was an unlawful monopoly. In 1912 and 1913, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania heard testimonies from both MPPC members, such as Siegmund Lubin, and "Independents" who later became Hollywood moguls, such as William Fox. Ultimately, in 1915, the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which found the MPPC in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and spelled the end for the already weakening MPPC. -- Eric Hoyt, 2012
Date Added:
September 12, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Gov't Ex. 133, Agt. Edison & Eastman Kodak Cos. 573 from tlie Eastman Company to the Patents Company, (lie Edison Company should be indebted to the Eastman Company for "Lieensed Film" or other supplies purchased from or furnished by the Eastman Company to the Edison Company between the date hereof and June 20, 1909, such royalties shall be applied by it on account of said indebtedness, the balance, if any, remaining over such indebtedness, to be paid by the Eastman Company to the Patents Company, and a statement at the same time shall be given by the Eastman Company to the Patents Company of the amount of such indebtedness incurred between the date hereof and June 20, 1909, to which said royalties have been applied by it. 19. It is further mutually covenanted and agreed by and and between the Patents Company and the Eastman Company that in case any "foreign manufacturer" aforesaid has heretofore established or shall hereafter establish a business of manufacturing and selling positive or negative motion pictures in the United States, and shall be licensed by the Patents Company, in and by a duly executed agreement in writing, the same in all substantial respects as the license agreements referred to in Paragraph 1, then, and from the time such license agreement goes into effect, and said Eastman Company is notified thereof in writing by the Patents Company, the Eastman Company shall charge to and collect from such licensee the royalties referred to in Paragraph 6 of this agreement and pay the same to the Patents Company in the same manner as that provided for in Paragraph 18 respecting the charging to and collecting from the "Patents Company licensees" of royalties upon "Licensed Film" and paying the same to the Patents Company. But no royalty shall be charged to or collected from any "foreign maimfacturers" for sensitized film sold to them by the Eastman Company unless and until they have been licensed by the Patents Company and the Eastman Company notified thereof as aforesaid. 20. The Eastman Company further covenants and agrees that it will keep an accurate account of all "Licensed Film" supplied by it to the "Patents Company licensees'1 and other film supplied to the other persons, firms and corporations as provided for in Paragraphs 14 and 18, (with the exception of the translucent or transparent sensitized film supplied to the