In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants (1913)

Record Details:

Title:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants
Date:
1913
Publisher:
New York, Appeal Printing Co.
Volume:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 1
Leaf #:
000601
Language:
English
Collection:
Government & Law and Early Cinema
Format:
Periodicals
Contributor:
The Museum of Modern Art Library, New York
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
These seven volumes contain the testimonies and supporting documents from the U.S. District Court's antitrust lawsuit against the Motion Picture Patents Company (MPPC). Formed in 1908, the MPPC (sometimes referred to asœ"the Edison Trust" or just "the Trust") sought to control the American film industry through pooling patents and demanding that producers and exhibitors acquire licenses to those patents. Independent producers and exhibitors, who refused to license the patents, argued that the MPPC was an unlawful monopoly. In 1912 and 1913, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania heard testimonies from both MPPC members, such as Siegmund Lubin, and "Independents" who later became Hollywood moguls, such as William Fox. Ultimately, in 1915, the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which found the MPPC in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and spelled the end for the already weakening MPPC. -- Eric Hoyt, 2012
Date Added:
May 23, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Gov't Ex. 133, Agt. Edison & Eastman Kodak Cos. 575 the East man Company to the Patents Company, the latter should be desirous of satisfying itself by having an examination made of the books of aceount of the Eastman Company as to the accuracy of the statements so made to it by the Eastman Company, it may have such examination made of the books of account of the Eastman Company (so far as the same may relate to the sale by it of "Licensed Film'' to the "Patents Company licensees" and such other film (with the exceptions hereinbefore provided for) to other persons, firms and corporations as provided for in Paragraph 14 and the "Patents Company licensees1') by the public accountants, Price, Waterhouse & Company, of New York, N. Y., or any other public accountants that may hereafter be agreed upon by the Patents Company and the Eastman Company. 22. It is further mutually covenanted and agreed by and between the Patents Company and the Eastman Company that nothing herein contained shall interfere with or prevent the manufacture, sale or shipment by the Eastman Company of sensitized film suitable for the commercial production of negative or positive motion pictures, for export, without the payment of any royalty or other consideration therefor to the Patents Company, when such film, addressed to the foreign purchaser, agent or consignee, is delivered to a vessel or to a transportation company for transportation to a foreign country, and not otherwise. The Eastman Company covenants and agrees that it will use all reasonable efforts to prevent the reimportation of any such film sold for export, into the United States in an unexposed condition, and that it will not sell any such film for export for the purpose of reimporting it into the United States in an unexposed condition. 23. The Patents Company further covenants and agrees that it will, during the continuance of this agreement, license such a number of persons, firms and corporations, under said letters patent Nos. 578,185; 580,749; 586,953, 588,916; 673,329; 673,992; 707,931; 722,382; 711,251; 770,937; 771,280; 785.205 and 785,237, to make and sell exhibiting or projecting machines containing the inventions described ami claimed in the same, capable of exhibiting or projecting motion pictures on film of a width greater