In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants (1913)

Page scan 000638 from In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants

Record Details:

Title:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants
Date:
1913
Publisher:
New York, Appeal Printing Co.
Volume:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 1
Leaf #:
000638
Language:
English
Collection:
Government & Law and Early Cinema
Format:
Periodicals
Contributor:
The Museum of Modern Art Library, New York
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
These seven volumes contain the testimonies and supporting documents from the U.S. District Court's antitrust lawsuit against the Motion Picture Patents Company (MPPC). Formed in 1908, the MPPC (sometimes referred to asœ"the Edison Trust" or just "the Trust") sought to control the American film industry through pooling patents and demanding that producers and exhibitors acquire licenses to those patents. Independent producers and exhibitors, who refused to license the patents, argued that the MPPC was an unlawful monopoly. In 1912 and 1913, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania heard testimonies from both MPPC members, such as Siegmund Lubin, and "Independents" who later became Hollywood moguls, such as William Fox. Ultimately, in 1915, the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which found the MPPC in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and spelled the end for the already weakening MPPC. -- Eric Hoyt, 2012
Date Added:
September 12, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

612 Gov't Ex. 131, Agt. Edisox & Eastman Kodak Cos. 1 then and thereafter be recognized and dealt with by the Patents Company as the successor of the Eastman Com pany in the ownership of said right and authority and all other rights of the Eastman Company under this agreement and be entitled to all the benefits and privileges thereof; but before any such purchaser shall be recognized as such assignee and successor of the Eastman Company, said purchaser shall first agree in writing to accept, act under, and perform the covenants, stipulations and conditions of this agreement. 2 11. The Patents Company covenants and agrees to promptly notify the Eastman Company of the names and addresses of all the "Patents Company licensees" to whom it has granted or may hereafter grant licenses, and of the dates when their license agreements take effect, in order that the Eastman Company may be advised as to Avhom it is to sell the "Licensed Film" aforesaid, and also be able to compute the royalty referred to in Paragraph 6, and also covenants and agrees to promptly notify the Eastman Company of the revocation, cancellation or termination otherwise of any license agreements with the "Patents Company licensees" so that the Eastman Company may know that such license agreements have been terminated and discontinue the sale of such "Licensed Film" to such persons, firms and corporations named therein; it being understood that when any such license is so terminated, the licensee named therein shall cease to be one of the "Patents Company licensees" and that the Eastman Company shall, immediately upon being so notified of the fact, discontinue the sale of such "Licensed Film" to such licensee. 12. The Patents Company further authorizes and empowers the Eastman Company to charge to and collect from each of the "Patents Company licensees" to whom the Eastman Company supplies such "Licensed Film," and pay over to it (said Patents Company), in the manner hereinafter provided for, the royalties referred to in Paragraph 6 of tli is agreement. 13. The Patents Company, for itself, its successors, assigns and legal representatives, hereby releases, acquits and