In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants (1913)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Joseph Hopp, Dihect Examination. 1063 our sincere thanks for your very courteous offer, * which we are unable to take up at this time. Yous very truly, GENERAL FILM COMPANY, P. L. Waters, PLW/C General Manager." Our action was prompted by the fact that those interested in the Standard Film Exchange are interested in theatres extensively, and that on September 14, 1909, this Exchange was convicted of maintaining an unauthorized 2 branch exchange through which it sub-rented film and obtained an unfair advantage over other exhibitors and exchanges. It was represented to us that a widow who had no part in the management of this exchange, had nearly all her money invested in it and for this reason we were urged not to cancel its license. These representations induced us to postpone the cancelling of its license, and instead, to require the Exchange to contribute §1,000 toward the cost of obtaining the evidence on which it was convicted, to dismiss and not again 3 employ the manager of its unauthorized office, to close said office, and to require all theatres in which those connected with the Standard Film Exchange had any interest, to obtain service from other exchanges. Exhibitors in the vicinity of Chicago, who have heretofore received service from the Standard Film Exchange, can obtain licensed service from the following exchanges : General Film Company, 85 Dearborn Street, Chicago, 111. General Film Company, 77 South Clark Street, Chicago, 4 111. George K. Spoor Company, 435 North Clark Street, Chicago, 111. H. & H. Film Service, 98 Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 111. General Film Company, 71 Griswold Street, Detroit, Mich. H. Lieber Company, 24 West Washington Street, Indianapolis, Ind.