In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants (1913)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

1118 Keuben Solz, Redirect Examination. 1 Mr. Kingsley: Objected to as not properly redirect examination. A. I have seen Mr. Nichols, representing the branch in Pittsburgh, and he told me that he cannot give me any films until I get reinstated my license by the main office in New York. That is, the Motion Picture Patents Company. Q. Mr. Nichols was the local manager of the General Film Company at Pittsburgh? A. At Pittsburgh. Q. You have not answered my question. Was he or 2 not the local manager at Pittsburgh of the General Film Company? A. Yes, sir. Whereupon, at 4.15 P. M. on this 9th day of July, 1913, the hearing is adjourned until 10.30 A. M., Thursday, July 10th, 1913, at Room 47, Post Office Building, New York City.