In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants (1913)

Record Details:

Title:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants
Date:
1913
Publisher:
New York, Appeal Printing Co.
Volume:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 3
Leaf #:
000114
Language:
English
Collection:
Government & Law and Early Cinema
Format:
Periodicals
Contributor:
The Museum of Modern Art Library, New York
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
These seven volumes contain the testimonies and supporting documents from the U.S. District Court's antitrust lawsuit against the Motion Picture Patents Company (MPPC). Formed in 1908, the MPPC (sometimes referred to asœ"the Edison Trust" or just "the Trust") sought to control the American film industry through pooling patents and demanding that producers and exhibitors acquire licenses to those patents. Independent producers and exhibitors, who refused to license the patents, argued that the MPPC was an unlawful monopoly. In 1912 and 1913, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania heard testimonies from both MPPC members, such as Siegmund Lubin, and "Independents" who later became Hollywood moguls, such as William Fox. Ultimately, in 1915, the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which found the MPPC in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and spelled the end for the already weakening MPPC. -- Eric Hoyt, 2012
Date Added:
July 11, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

1340 H. N. Marvin, Direct Examination. Patent Nos. 578,185, 580,749, 586,953, 588,916, 629,063, 673,329, 673,992, 707,934, 722,382, 744,251, 770,937, 771,280, 785,205 and 785,237, and reissued Letters Patent Nos. 13,329 and 12,192, or use by the Licensee of the inventions, or any of them, covered by said Letters Patent or either of them prior to the date hereof. 9. The Licensee hereby recognizes and admits the validity of said reissued Letters Patent No. 13,329, and the validity of said reissued Letters Patent No. 12,192 and Letters Patent Nos. 578,185, 580,749, 586,953, 588,916, 629,063, 673,329, 673,992, 707,934, 722,382, 744,251, 770,937, 771,280, 785,205 and 785,237, and agrees not to contest or question the same during the continuance of this agreement. 10. The Licensee further covenants and agrees that the Licensee will, within fifteen (15) days after the twentieth (20th) day of each month after this agreement takes effect, and during its continuance, submit a statement in writing, signed by the proper officer of the Licensee, and sworn to if requested by the Licensor, showing the total number of running feet of new subjects of kinemacolor motion pictures listed and offered for lease or used for profit by it, in the "lease territory aforesaid" during the period from the twentieth (20th) day of the preceding calendar month to the twentieth (20th) day of the month for which such statement is submitted, and will at the same time pay to the Licensor a royalty of one cent (lc) per running foot on such total number of running feet of new subjects. The Licensee further covenants and agrees to keep correct books of account and to permit the Licensor to determine, by examination thereof, at all reasonable times and through any reputable chartered accountants to be selected by the Licensor, the number of running feet of new subjects of kinemacolor motion pictures so listed and leased or used for profit by the Licensee while this agreement is in effect, if the Licensorshould so desire. By the expression "running feet of new subjects'' as used in this agreement, the parties hereto agree, is meant the aggregate amount ascertained by adding together the individual number of running feet of one print of each and every new kinemacolor motion picture on film of a greater width