In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants (1913)

Record Details:

Title:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants
Date:
1913
Publisher:
New York, Appeal Printing Co.
Volume:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 4
Leaf #:
000131
Language:
English
Collection:
Government & Law and Early Cinema
Format:
Periodicals
Contributor:
The Museum of Modern Art Library, New York
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
These seven volumes contain the testimonies and supporting documents from the U.S. District Court's antitrust lawsuit against the Motion Picture Patents Company (MPPC). Formed in 1908, the MPPC (sometimes referred to asœ"the Edison Trust" or just "the Trust") sought to control the American film industry through pooling patents and demanding that producers and exhibitors acquire licenses to those patents. Independent producers and exhibitors, who refused to license the patents, argued that the MPPC was an unlawful monopoly. In 1912 and 1913, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania heard testimonies from both MPPC members, such as Siegmund Lubin, and "Independents" who later became Hollywood moguls, such as William Fox. Ultimately, in 1915, the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which found the MPPC in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and spelled the end for the already weakening MPPC. -- Eric Hoyt, 2012
Date Added:
September 21, 2023
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Samuel Long, Cross Examination. L981 at the same time delivering to him a true copy thereof on the 4th day of November A. D. 1907 . LUMAN T. HOY, TJ. S. Marshall, By Wm, E. Cass, Deputy. (ENDORSED) Filed Nov. 7, 1907. H. S. Stoddard, Clerk. United States of America, ^ Northern District of Illinois, > ss. : Eastern Division, J I, T. C. MacMILLAN, Clerk of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be true and complete copies of certain documents filed in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois in case No. 26,512, Thomas A. Edison v. Selig Polyscope Company, as follows towit : Opinion of Judge Kohlsaat filed Jan. 29, 1910, as of Oct. 24, 1907, and Injunction Writ filed Nov. 7, 1907, as the same appear from the originals thereof now remaining in my custody and control. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and and affixed the seal of said [Seal.] Court at my office in Chicago, in said District, this fifth day of September A. D. 1913. T. C. MacMILLAN, Clerk. By John H. R. Jamar, Deputy Clerk. Mr. Caldwell: Now, the understanding is that we adjourn until December 1st. The Examiner: By agreement of counsel? Mr. Grosvenok : I want to put on the record that I consent to this adjournment to that date, my un