In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants (1914)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Defendants' Exhibit No. 164. 3113 (Docket of Dyer & Dyer.) U. S. CIRCUIT COURT, Southern District of New York. On Patent 589,168 Thomas A. Edison, vs. In Equity. American Vitagbaph Company and YVal / No< 7597. ter Arthur individually and as General Manager of said Company. Complainant's SoFr, Dyer, Edmonds & Dyer. Defendants' Solicitor, William R, Baird. 1900. Sep. 13 Bill filed and subpoena issued; returnable 1st Monday of November. " 13 Subpoena filed p. s. on all defendants 9/13/00. " IT Appearance entered for defendants, by Wm. R. Baird. " 17 Filed and entered consent decree. " 18 Injunction issued. " 18 Injunction filed p. s. on defendants.