In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants (1914)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Defendants' Exhibit No. 164. 3117 (Docket of Dyer cC Dyer.) U. S. CIRCUIT COURT, Northern District of Illinois — Northern Division. On Patent 589,168 Thomas A. Edison, vs. In Equity. Stereoptican and Film Exchange and } Gen'i No. 25,809. William B. Moore individually and as Treasurer and Manager of said Company. Complainant's Solrs., Isham, Lincoln k Beale (Dyer, Edmonds & Dyer, of Counsel.) Defendants' SoFr, Charles T. Brown. 1901 Jan. 31 Bill of complaint forwarded to Isham, Lincoln & Beale Feb. 5 Bill filed; subpoena issued Subpoena served and filed p. s. on defendants Mch. 4 Appearance entered for defendants, by Chas. T, Brown " 30 Answer filed May 2 Replication forwarded 6 " filed Aug. 5 Stipulation extending time for taking prima facie proofs until November rule day Oct. 20 Stipulation extending time for taking prima facie proofs until February rule day, 1902 1902 Feb (: Wrote Isham, Lincoln & Beale to either secure extension of time or dismissal of suit ''without prejudice" 10 Isham, Lincoln & Beale appeared before Judge Kohlsaat on opposition to dismiss complaint. Affidavit of W. B. Moore for defendants and affidavit of Richard X. Dyer for complainant,