In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants (1914)

Page scan 000656 from In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants

Record Details:

Title:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants
Date:
1914
Publisher:
New York, Appeal Printing Co.
Volume:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 6
Leaf #:
000656
Language:
English
Collection:
Early Cinema and Government & Law
Format:
Periodicals
Contributor:
The Museum of Modern Art Library, New York
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
These seven volumes contain the testimonies and supporting documents from the U.S. District Court's antitrust lawsuit against the Motion Picture Patents Company (MPPC). Formed in 1908, the MPPC (sometimes referred to asœ"the Edison Trust" or just "the Trust") sought to control the American film industry through pooling patents and demanding that producers and exhibitors acquire licenses to those patents. Independent producers and exhibitors, who refused to license the patents, argued that the MPPC was an unlawful monopoly. In 1912 and 1913, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania heard testimonies from both MPPC members, such as Siegmund Lubin, and "Independents" who later became Hollywood moguls, such as William Fox. Ultimately, in 1915, the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which found the MPPC in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and spelled the end for the already weakening MPPC. -- Eric Hoyt, 2012
Date Added:
September 12, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

lxvi GENERAL INDEX. Fox, William : vol. page Direct Examination II 658 700 Cross Examination 781 795 Redirect Examination 795 796 Recross Examination 796 797 General Film Company of Maine: Advertisement of a Special Feature Production by Kalem Co. for July 1, 1912 ; Petitioner's Exhibit 93 I 375 Agreement, General Film Co. and Patents Co., April 21, 1910, printed as Exhibit 7 to Petition; Petitioner's Exhibit 130 I 517 Agreement between General Film Co. and Edison Mfg. Co., dated April 21, 1910, printed as Exhibit 8 on page 116 of Petition. Similar agreements were executed by each of the other licensed manufacturers I 552 By-Laws of General Film Co., Extracts from ; Petitioner's Exhibit 64 I 201 Branches of General Film Co., as of Jan. 12, 1912; Petitioner's Exhibit 63 I 199 Branches of General Film Co., as of Nov. 10, 1913; Defendants' Exhibit 108 Ill 1608 Charter, General Film Company of Maine, April 21, 1910; printed as Exhibit 6 to Petition II 924 Circular Letter to Exhibitors from Denver, Colo., dated Sept. 15, 1910, on letterhead of G. F. Co.; Petitioner's Exhibit 206 II 1131