In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants (1914)

Record Details:

Title:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants
Date:
1914
Publisher:
New York, Appeal Printing Co.
Volume:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 6
Leaf #:
000665
Language:
English
Collection:
Early Cinema and Government & Law
Format:
Periodicals
Contributor:
The Museum of Modern Art Library, New York
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
These seven volumes contain the testimonies and supporting documents from the U.S. District Court's antitrust lawsuit against the Motion Picture Patents Company (MPPC). Formed in 1908, the MPPC (sometimes referred to asœ"the Edison Trust" or just "the Trust") sought to control the American film industry through pooling patents and demanding that producers and exhibitors acquire licenses to those patents. Independent producers and exhibitors, who refused to license the patents, argued that the MPPC was an unlawful monopoly. In 1912 and 1913, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania heard testimonies from both MPPC members, such as Siegmund Lubin, and "Independents" who later became Hollywood moguls, such as William Fox. Ultimately, in 1915, the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which found the MPPC in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and spelled the end for the already weakening MPPC. -- Eric Hoyt, 2012
Date Added:
September 21, 2023
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

GENERAL INDEX. 1XXV George Kleine, Continued : vol. page Answer of Kleine Optical Co. in case of Edison Mfg. Co. v. Kleine Optical Co., April 2, 1908; Petitioner's Exhibit 171 II 900 Article in Show World May 16, 1908, by Streyekmans, re Petition of Kleine Optical Co. v. Edison Mfg. Co. ; Petitioner's Exhibit 259 V 2545 Article by George Kleine in Show World March 7, 1908, entitled "Kleine Talks — Biograph Company Denies Validity of Patents" ; Petitioner's Exhibit 271 VI 3347 (See also Petitioner's Exhibit 203, Vol. V, p. 2509.) Article by George Kleine in Show World April 4, 1909, entitled "Kleine Disputes Validity of Edison Patents" ; Petitioner's Exhibit 272 VI 3357 Letter, George Kleine to Greater New York Film Rental Co., Jan. 23, 1909; Petitioner's Exhibit 90 I 384 Letter, Kleine Optical Co. to Edison Mfg. Co., Feb. 19, 1908; Petitioner's Exhibit 175 II 908 Koerpel, Jonas A. : Direct Examination Ill 1792-1807 Cross Examination 1807-1 Ml Redirect Examination 1814-1815 Recross Examination 1815