In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants (1914)

Record Details:

Title:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants
Date:
1914
Publisher:
New York, Appeal Printing Co.
Volume:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 6
Leaf #:
000667
Language:
English
Collection:
Early Cinema and Government & Law
Format:
Periodicals
Contributor:
The Museum of Modern Art Library, New York
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
These seven volumes contain the testimonies and supporting documents from the U.S. District Court's antitrust lawsuit against the Motion Picture Patents Company (MPPC). Formed in 1908, the MPPC (sometimes referred to asœ"the Edison Trust" or just "the Trust") sought to control the American film industry through pooling patents and demanding that producers and exhibitors acquire licenses to those patents. Independent producers and exhibitors, who refused to license the patents, argued that the MPPC was an unlawful monopoly. In 1912 and 1913, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania heard testimonies from both MPPC members, such as Siegmund Lubin, and "Independents" who later became Hollywood moguls, such as William Fox. Ultimately, in 1915, the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which found the MPPC in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and spelled the end for the already weakening MPPC. -- Eric Hoyt, 2012
Date Added:
September 21, 2023
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

GENERAL INDEX. lxxvii Lubin Manufacturing Co., Continued: vol. page License Agreement under the Projecting Machine Patents between Patents Co. and Lubin Mfg. Co., dated Jan. 7, 1909, similar to Exhibit 5 to Petition I 244 Agreement between Lubin Mfg. Co. and General Film Co., dated April 21, 1910, similar to Exhibit 8 on page 116 of Petition I 552 Supplemental License Agreement. Patents Co. and Lubin Mfg. Co., dated on or about Jan. 26, 1909, similar to Exhibit 2 to Answer of Patents Co. ; Defendants' Exhibit 49 Ill 1329 License Agreement between Patents Co. and Lubin Mfg. Co., dated June 6, 1912, similar to Exhibit 3 to Answer of Patents Co.; Defendants' Exhibit 17 Ill 1309 License Agreement, dated June 20, 1913, between Patents Co. and Lubin Mfg. Co., similar to Defendants' Exhibit 18 Ill 1310 ( ►pinion of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, in case of Lubin Mfg. Co. v. Swaab, dated March 31, 1913; Defendants' Exhibit 9 II 888 Lubin, Siegmund: Direct Examination V 3015-3050 Cross Examination VI 3081-3089 Redirect Examination 3089 Recross Examination 3089-3090