In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants (1912-1913)

Record Details:

Title:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants
Date:
1912-1913
Publisher:
New York, Appeal Printing Co.
Volume:
In the District Court of the United States, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States of America, petitioner, vs. Motion Picture Patents Company, et al., defendants : record volume 7
Leaf #:
000643
Language:
English
Collection:
Government & Law and Early Cinema
Format:
Periodicals
Contributor:
The Museum of Modern Art Library, New York
Sponsor:
Media History Digital Library
Coordinator:
Media History Digital Library
Description:
These seven volumes contain the testimonies and supporting documents from the U.S. District Court's antitrust lawsuit against the Motion Picture Patents Company (MPPC). Formed in 1908, the MPPC (sometimes referred to asœ"the Edison Trust" or just "the Trust") sought to control the American film industry through pooling patents and demanding that producers and exhibitors acquire licenses to those patents. Independent producers and exhibitors, who refused to license the patents, argued that the MPPC was an unlawful monopoly. In 1912 and 1913, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania heard testimonies from both MPPC members, such as Siegmund Lubin, and "Independents" who later became Hollywood moguls, such as William Fox. Ultimately, in 1915, the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which found the MPPC in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and spelled the end for the already weakening MPPC. -- Eric Hoyt, 2012
Date Added:
June 27, 2024
Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Motion Pic. Tat. Co; and The Precision Mach. Co., Enc. 621 any royalties under the aforesaid letters patent on any exhibiting or projecting machines sold bona tide for export) then the licensor will upon demand of the licensee convey to the licensee terms, conditions and stipulations similar to those conveyed to said additional licensee. (12) II is mutually covenanted and agreed by and between the Licensor and Licensee that, unless sooner terminated, as hereinbefore and hereinafter provided, this agreement, and the license granted thereby, shall take effect on June 20, 1912, and shall continue until June 20. 1913, but that the Licensee may renew this agreement and license thereafter from year to year upon the same terms, conditions and stipulations as herein provided, by giving notice to the Licensor on or before the 20th day of March in each year, beginning with the year 1913, of the Licensee's election to so renew this agreement and license and upon the giving of each such notice this agreement and the license thereby granted shall be considered and treated by the Licensor and Licensee as renewed for the period of one year, beginning June 20th of the year following such notice, and such notice and renewal may be given and made by the Licensee during the life or lives of each or all of the patents under which the Licensee is hereby licensed. In case, however, that the Licensor should become bankrupt. cease doing business, or should be dissolved, voluntarily or otherWise, or its Charter should be repealed, then, on the happening of either of such events, this agreement and the agreements made with the additional licensees hereinbefore provided for, that are then in force, shall forthwith, terminate and be at an end. (13) Tt is further mutually covenanted and agreed by and between iho Licensor and Licensee, that if, during said original term or during any such renewal period, either party should, knowingly or through gross neglect or carelessness, be guilty of a breach, violation or non-performance (^ its covenants, conditions and stipulations, resulting in substantial injury to the other party, and should, for the period of forty (40) days after notice thereof from the other party persist therein or fail to correct, repair or remedy the same, then and in such case the partv aggrieved may terminate this agreement by giving notice in writing to the guilty party of its intention so to do. Tt is, however, mutually covenanted and agreed bv and between the Licensor ami Licensee that if the guilty