International projectionist (Jan 1963-June 1965)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Volume 39 INTERNATIONAL PROJECTIONIST January, 1964 Number 1 A Neglected Asset: TINTED RELEASE-PRINT FILM By ROBERT A. MITCHELL PART II Tinting the screen with a dominant color tone to match the mood of the scene, with an appropriate change of color with each change of mood, time, or locale, is a trick of the trade so well known and so emphatically effective in the days of the silent films that it seems almost ridiculous to belabor the manifold virtues of tinted-base print films. But hammer away we must: the art of utilizing tinted release positive for monochrome ("black-andwhite" ) productions is at present totally neglected to the detriment of screen and boxoffice alike. Interference with the reproduction of the optical soundtrack is no longer a valid excuse for the abandonment of this effective instrument of cinematic art. The first installment of this article demonstrated conclusively that no color of tinted film noticeably attenuates sound volume when the common infrared-sensitive photocell or phototransistor is used in the soundhead. The entire question boils down to a matter of showmanship, an alert recognition of the uniquely visual character of entertainment motion pictures. Why should the theatre screen remain stripped bare of a most useful dramatic embellishment? Why should moviegoers be subjected in the theatre to the same monotonously unexpressive and vis 4 ually unattractive gray image tones that they see all the time at home on black-and-white TV? Remember — about 90 per cent of all feature-film print footage was tinted in the days when black-andwhite movies were undeniably very attractive pictorially and dramatically powerful. Of course, we have superb natural color today, but the majority of feature pictures are still photographed in monochrome, a practice that should continue because monochrome seems best suited to the more emotional type of screen play. The theatre screen is vastly superior to television as an audiovisual medium. It is large and panoramic: it is pictorially superior to TV, presenting images of greater clarity and with a wider range of lifelike photographic contrasts: it does not "fog over" on low-key scenes: it has no disturbing scanning-line pattern: it presents natural color of much higher quality than even the very best color TV: it is able to offer stereophonic sound of the highest audio fidelity. The theatre screen formerly did. and could right now, appropriately color by means of tinted-base film and toned photographic images its monochrome offerings, thus enhancing the pictorial values and scene-to-scene moods of pictures not photographed International Projectionist Januarv. 1964