International projectionist (Jan 1963-June 1965)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Now. Are you willing to risk it all on less than Eastman films ? More than anything else except creative skill, film is crucial to quality in moviemaking. Isn't it a false economy, then, to attempt to save a fraction of a cent per foot on film stock which has less than Eastman quality? And doesn't poor film quality jeopardize your entire investment, even make talent look bad? But total-picture quality doesn't demand that you merely shoot on the best negative. There's also the print stock to consider . . . and some don't. It's a great mistake— both from your point of view and that of your audience— to print on anything less than EASTMAN Film. Look at it this way. Film— both negative and print stock— must have consistent speed, uniform processing characteristics, dimensional stability, precision perforations and uniform slit edges. In the theater it must possess a long weartear capability for precision in projection, and in order to hold down costly print reorders. EASTMAN Films have all these qualities because Eastman's engineering and technical facilities are unique. Furthermore, Eastman's film specialists are always at hand to help you maximize production efficiency. Everything considered, doesn't it make good sense to use EASTMAN all the way? Motion Picture and Education Markets Division EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY Rochester, N.Y. New York, N.Y. Chicago, 111. Hollywood, Calif. I Ulllll II EASTMAN FILM iiniimm i in International Projectionist April, 1965