We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.
Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.
November 1931
INTERNATIONAL PROJECTIONIST
ff)//ef/nof//o/na/
POECTK
Edited by James /• Finn
Volume I
NOVEMBER 1931
Number 2
Monthly Chat Announcement
Sound Projection: Theory and Practice 7
R. H. McCuLLOUGH
Halation: Its Cause, Effect and the Remedy 9
H. Parker and J. I. Crabtree
Color in Motion Pictures
M. ROBACH
11
Characteristics of G-M Visitron Photo Electric Cells 12
Evolution of I. A. Bulletin R. 0. Baker
14
Recurrent Reproducer Noise 15
New 3x4 Standard Aperture For Projection 16
Dividends From Pennies 20
Kendall Emerson, M. D.
Editorial Page 21
The Art of Continuous Cinematography 22 William C. Plank
Mathematics for the Projectionist 24 Siegfried S. Meyers
Alliance Items 26
Control of A. P. S. Passes to West Coast Group 27
Sound and Television School "Racket" 28
James J. Finn
Film Mutilation Television News Notes
The Patent Page
30 31 33
H. L. BURKITT
Notes from the Supply Field 35 Mechanical Hints 37
Notes on the S.M.P.E. Progress Report 39
Miscellaneous Items Technical Hints News Notes
Published Monthly by
JAMES J. FINN PUBLISHING CORP.
1 WEST 47th STREET, NEW YORK, N. Y.
Advertising Manager: James Beecroft Circulation Manager: Ruth Entracht
West Coast Representative Hallet E. Cole, 846 South Broadway, Los Angeles, Calif. /
Yearly Stjbscbiption: United States and possessions, $2 (two years, $3) ; foreign coontries, $2.50. Single copies, 25 cents. Changes of address should be submitted two weeks in advance of date of publication to insure receipt of current issue.
Entire contents copyright, 1931, by James J. Finn Publishing Corp. International Projectionist is not responsible for personal opinions appearing in signed articles in its columns. Cover design by Morgan Bryan. Printed by Roy Press, N. Y.
MONTHLY CHAT
ITS technical excellence assured from the very start, Intertaional Projectionist, looks for new worlds to conquer. And finds them. The typographical beauty of our first issue, which induced so many fine comphments (for which we thank you one and all), has set eur contemporaries to hustling. One new cover has already appeared; and we hear rumblings of still another new cover, with an accompanying slight reduction in overall size. This last move is one near and dear to our own heart (don't mention it).
This service by us in the cause of ART is performed with cheerful mien; but we can't withhold the observation that a mere new cover or a change in overall size will fail miserably in matching the high editorial standard we have set.
GREAT chunks of publicity were spread over the landscape of this fair country by the recent demonstration of television at the Broadway Theatre in New York. Most of this pubhcity was along conventional lines: "television arrived" and all that sort of bunk. Nothing to worry about, gentlemen. Absolutely nothing.
HARDLY a week passes now but what a new indication is had of the increasing interest of the industry as a whole in the quality of the image on the screen. Sound production and reproduction has had more than its share of attention, to the obvious neglect of picture projection. Who is there who will say that the picture in the average theatre today is anything but terrible? No one. Pictures that appear on theatre screens these days would have been laughed at in, say, 1925.
Now, however, the "big boys" are waking up to the serious consequences of a poorly projected picture. Plans are afoot to improve the screen image. Who knows? the "big boys" might even buy a few dollars worth of equipment. Anyhow, they are once more aware of the existence of a projection room in the theatre.
THE ever alert Academy of M.P. Arts & Sciences is sponsoring new aperture standards for cameras and projectors, complete details of which are printed in this issue. The proposed new projector aperture is .615 x .820, which size appears to us to be very close to the safety mark. Whatever standard is finally adopted, projection will benefit greatly, and Portland, Maine, and San Francisco will once more be in agreement as to picture size. Score another for the Academy.