International projectionist (Jan-Dec 1952)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Modulated Air Blast for Reducing Film Buckle By WILLY BORBERG General Precision Laboratory, Pleasantville, N. Y. Present-day demands for high-intensity light sources point up the need for a suitable technique for reduction of excessive film buckle. This article shows why modulated air blast is to be preferred over continuous air blast. It presents experimentally obtained data regarding buckle magnitudes in 35-mm film. THE type of buckle with which we are concerned in the present discussion is a deformation which takes place during the frame cycle while the film is in the aperture. It may leave no record of its existence on the film after projection. It can be made visible by stroboscopic or high-speed photographic techniques, appearing as a rythmic — almost breathing — motion of the film surface in the aperture. It produces deterioration of image focus during part of the rapidly recurring projection cycle. Each single picture frame goes through a cycle which starts with pulldown into the aperture, proceeds through the first exposure, the flicker blade cutoff and the second exposure, and ends with the pulldown of the next frame. During the two exposure intervals the film arrests some of the radiant energy from the light source and transforms it into heat. This causes the film to buckle (or bulge) in a manner very similar to that observed in the operation of a bimetallic element. The emulsion, being more opaque than the base, absorbs energy, expands and becomes the outer or convex surface of the bulge. The magnitude of the deformation produced varies continuously during the frame cycle and by an amount which is more than sufficient to affect sharpness of image focus. The emulsion side of 35-mm film is toward the light source; and hence the film tends to move toward the light, away from the lens, while it is in the aperture. In accordance with the accepted terminology, the deformation is called negative when the emulsion side is convex, and conversely, positive when the emulsion side is concave. Flat film is considered to have zero deformation. The film upon entering the projector gate is not necessarily flat, but may have a slightly positive curl, the magnitude of which depends to some extent on the age and condition of the film. It appears that there is some shrinkage of both emulsion and base, the emulsion shrinking more than the base, so that the resulting curl is slightly positive. Typical positive displacement at the center of cold 35-mm film as it enters the gate is between zero and 0.010 in. How Film Buckles Instantly upon registration of the film frame with the aperture, the shutter uncovers the light for the first exposure of the cycle. Light energy is absorbed in the emulsion and transformed into heat. The expanding emulsion causes the exposed portion of the film frame to move from its initial zero or positive position, shifting it to a negative position, and causing it to take a somewhat spherical shape. There is a constantly increasing deformation during the first exposure, and a constantly changing distance of the emulsion surface with respect to the lens. Upon interception of the light by the flicker blade, further movement of the film surface toward the light source comes to a halt. With no light on the film, heat absorption by the film cannot take place. Instead, there is a loss of heat which causes the film to recede slightly toward the zero plane. At the start of the second exposure, the film surface stands somewhat between zero and its former maximum negative position. During the second exposure, the film continues its excursion negatively, first rapidly, then leveling off. At the end of this exposure the film reaches a more negative position than at the end of the first exposure. How Buckle Impairs Focus Figure 1 shows the correlation between the movement at the center of the film surface and particular instants in the frame cycle. The same movement occurs at points off the center of the film surface, though to a smaller degree. A significant effect which may be noted is that the center of the film, which is in motion during the entire cycle, travels through and beyond the acceptable focus limits defined by the depth of the focus of the projection lens. The projectionist, whose eye cannot follow this rapid sequence of events (48 times per second), has to pick a "best average focus" position of the projection lens, somewhere between the maximum positive and maximum negative of the two exposure periods. If he judges the focus at the center of the screen, he picks a "best average focus" position near the maximum negative buckle of the first exposure. The remaining, earlier part of this exposure produces only a poor and undefined image on the screen. A portion of the second exposure, also, is beyond the limit of good image defini PULL FIRST FLIC :ker SECOND NEXT DOWN rr u i in EXPOSURE BL UDE EXPOSURE FRAME |_ 1 IU / / UJ O /// ° — // UJ z n / / W, 8ffe /// *i x in ' / ■ H| 016 ERAGE— OCUS i v/ / ^^. // / / ■i-Jtt < zl ' Trunin **'*-1-' mSJTIT mini FIT * Uj < .JLllLIIlL JILLlII rW 2 ~> ' / / Ml x. on ' ' ////, ////. ^ , O <=> 2Cv // £ /A : H M. ^ DEPTH OF FOCUS RANGE OF LENS fCond. from Jour. SMPTE, Aug. 1952. FIG. 1. Film displacement due to buckling at center of frame — no air. 14 INTERNATIONAL PROJECTIONIST October 1952