International Review of Educational Cinematography (Jul-Dec 1929)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

represented does not appear as a mask, but participating in the festivity in a priestly attitude, with the cross on his breast. Also the representation of the Pope in a film enjoys the protection of German censorship. Thus the Higher Office has prohibited the production, otherwise unobjectionable, of the Pope,, as an advertisement of a film equally unobjectionable which represented the marvels of the Vatican, for the reason that a Catholic will not tolerate the effigy of the living Pope to be utilised as an advertisement or for it to be placed on an advertisement stand near the picture of a dancer or the notice of a review. As disgusting and brutalising, are considered the films whose projection can revive dormant primitive instincts in such a measure that moral resistance disappears and a desire to do similar actions is set up. This does not necessarily occur when a brutal objective action is represented ; the film must rather show relevant subjective influences to be condemned. The representation of a bull fight, cannot be prohibited because the events represented are objectively brutal and for the German spectator are considered as torture for men and beasts. They do not operate in a subjectively brutal way, but excite on the contrary horror and have a deterrent effect. The place and time of the action represented, are factors to be considered, in judging of the brutality, as well as the ever present subjective influence produced by the brutal action that can de strengthened by the details of the representation of brutal objective actions, or it can be eliminated by means of equivalent values, ethically or otherwise. Sensations are not considered repulsive when reproducing sporting or artistic actions that are intended only to cause the excitement or tickling of nerves. In the grotesque American film an influence, even subjectively irritating, may be excluded on account of the absolute unlikelihood and preposterousness of the action, for reasons of abnormal conditions of place and things which are beyond imitation. If however the grotesque performance refers to the reproduction of likely circumstances which can be imitated, and by which the grotesque action is brought back into the field of possibility and imitation, then such action will dull the better — 40