International Review of Educational Cinematography (Jan-Dec 1931)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

336 brigade. The teachers chosen to conduct these film-classes were carefully taught how to operate. Before starting the experiment the Chairman of the Committee had several meetings with the teaching staff in order to fix the details of the test. In the course of these meetings the following forms were drafted to be filled up by the teacher: Form i (Statement by the teacher) School .... Class Teacher's name Experiments with films in the elementary schools of Oslo 1922-1923. Time devoted to lessons by film 1) Films used a) Do you think that some of the films or parts of them are unsuitable for your pupils? b) Do you think that another film would be better? 2) Effect on pupils a) Did the projection notably increase the pupil's interest in the subject? b) Did you find that the film demonstration made things clearer to the pupils? c) Was the projection prejudicial to discipline? d) Did the film involve waste of time? Form 2 (pupils' tests) School Class Teacher's name Date on which film was shown Test set for first time on Test set for second time on Pupils Number of observations Total Name Mental ability First test Second test -a M 5 s 0 u "rt Rii»ht Wrong Total Right Wrong Total 0 H I 2 Average per pupil In order to have some standard of judgment the teachers concerned in this experiment were told: 1) to indicate the degree of the pupil's mental ability by a figure varying from one to five in accordance with a scale fixed on a basis of enquiries extending over a large number of pupils; 2) to count as observations all original statements by the pupils themselves; 3) not to count as observations: the explanatory text accompanying the film, words uttered by the teacher during the class, or anything which was obviously ahead} known to the pupil and not shown in the film,