International Review of Educational Cinematography (Jan-Dec 1932)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

-852 ing proportional table that it is not correct to assume, as has been don e in other similar inquiries, that the large mass of children and youths who frequent th e cinemas either alone or in the company of friends is composed of children of the workmen and agricultural class. The higher figures come from the professional classes and from those professional classes that are best off. financially speaking, and most occupied in intellectual work. The highest isolated attendances are to be observed in the case of the children of persons of private means and shop-keepers, while the minimum is registered by the children of employees and agriculturists. The highest figure for attendance with friends is to be seen among the children of men of the professional class and the shop-keepers, while the minimum is found among the agriculturists and the employees. In other words, those who go oftenest to the cinema accompanied by relations are the children of employees and agriculturists, while the minimum in this case is attributable to the children of shop-keepers and men of private means. Manner of Attendance : Total Alone % With friends % With reltns % Workmen 4660 703 15.08 1145 24,57 2812 60.35 Agriculturists -2782 308 11.07 669 24.04 1805 64.89 Private Means 1200 202 16.83 327 27.25 671 55.92 Employees 4113 462 11.23 859 20.88 3092 57.75 Professional Men 1638 204 12.46 488 29.79 946 57.75 Shop-keepers 3054 544 17.81 852 27.89 1658 54.30 The phenomenon under consideration is not easily explained. That the children of men of private means and professional men should provide high figures for the second category is understandable owing to social conditions and the number of relationships between the various families. The maximum given for the third category of manner of attendance, that is, by the children of employees, is also logical. We can understand that this class as a consequence of its mental attitude and habits would naturally prefer to undertake the surveillance of its children even when they go to places of amusemen t so as not to let them run the risk of the dangers inevitably inherent in isolated attendance or attendance with friends. The other returns, on the other hand, offer difficulties and complexities for analysis which would be worth a more detailed examination. Such would, however, not be within the scope of the present statistical study. For this group of questions, we may make the following summarized table : — Manner of Attendance : Alone With friends With relations Shop-keepers Professional Men Employees Men of Pvte Means Shop-keepers Agriculturists Workmen Men of Pvte Means Workmen Professional men Workmen Professional Men Employees Agriculturists Men of Pvte Means Agriculturists Employees Shop-keepers