International Review of Educational Cinematography (Jan-Dec 1934)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE DANGER OF VENEREAL DISEASES 795 to combine an anti-venereal lecture with one on sexual anatomy and physiology. If the problem appears under this aspect from the general point of view, it will be the same from the cinematograph point of view. We do not in the least see the advantage, for the anti-venereal campaign, of showing the anatomy and physiology of sexual organs at the cinema, even schematically. It could be done, certainly, in spite of the difficulties in the way, which in our opinion are not insurmountable; and we have seen some films, especially foreign ones, presented with great refinement, which we consider could be shown to boys and girls, from the age of puberty, without the slightest inconvenience. But since this is not the general opinion and since it is not indispensable to anti-venereal edu cation, why run the risk of having any attempt at such education forbidden by insisting, for purely doctrinal reasons, on giving the sexual education at the same time as the anti-venereal? In our opinion, the mere posing of the question provides the answer to it. But whatever may be thought on this particular point, we shall never tire of asserting that the cinema represents one of the best means at hand for anti-venereal education; a much better means than the lecture and easier to use than the radio; and its value cannot but increase through the infinitely greater possibilities offered by the dramatized talking film. We must recognize that from now on the cinema is the best means to use for popular education against the danger of venereal diseases.