Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1930-1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

196 LOYD A. JONES AND OTTO SANDVIK [J. S. M. P. K. power for Reprotone B is slightly lower than motion picture positive. For values of contrast greater than 1 to 3.2, however, the resolving power of Reprotone B is markedly greater than that of motion picture positive. The effective contrast in sound recording is a function of the modulation of exposure and the amount of scattered light present due to lens aberrations, lens flare, dirty lens surfaces, etc. It is difficult to determine the mean effective contrast existing under practical ONE: POSITIVE: S.B. B>OR*X PEVELOPER. 60 <bO 40 TIME. OF DEVELOPMENT IN MINUTES 4 8 IZ. Ifc FIG. 9. Resolving power-time of development curves for motion picture positive for an image density of 0.30, developed in metol hydroquinone borax. sound recording conditions. It seems almost certain, however, that with a high quality optical system in perfect adjustment the mean effective contrast should be well above the 3.2 ratio and under such conditions Reprotone B should be somewhat superior to motion picture positive from the standpoint of resolving power. We have seen above (Fig. 6) that the sensitometric characteristic curve of the experimental, high contrast emulsion is quite different from that of the motion picture positive. Likewise, the resolving