Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1930-1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

SIXTEEN-MM. SOUND-ON-FILM J. O. BAKER** Summary. — Improvements that have been made in the production and reproduction of sound on 16-mm. film are briefly described, together -with some of the problems that have been encountered. The two methods of obtaining sound-on-film, namely, recording and optical reduction printing, are discussed. It is now possible to reduce optically frequencies as high as 9000 cycles on 16-mm. film. Using a practical design of 16-mm. reproducing equipment it is possible to obtain sound from the 16-mm. film of as good quality as the sound that was formerly obtained from the average 35-mm. theater equipment. The purpose of this paper is to describe briefly the improvements that have been made in the production and reproduction of sound on 16-mm. film and some of the problems that have been encountered. The task of overcoming those problems has led not only to methods of producing high frequencies on 16-mm. film, but incidentally has also assisted in the production of better 35-mm. sound. A comparison of the two and their relative frequency ranges will serve to give an idea of the improvements that have been made and the quality of reproduction that can be obtained from 16-mm. film. In the past it has been the commercial practice to limit the high- frequency response on 16-mm. film to approximately 4000 cycles, and on 35-mm. film to approximately 6000 cycles. General im- provements that have been made in 35-mm. recording, processing, and reproducing have extended the frequency range to 9000 and 10,000 cycles. Similar improvements in the 16-mm. processing have ex- tended the 16-mm. frequency range to 6000 cycles without serious attenuation, while frequencies as high as 9000 cycles can be placed on the film and reproduced on high-fidelity reproducing equipment. As pointed out in a previous paper 1 there are two methods of ob- taining sound on 16-mm. film from 35-mm. recordings: namely, by re-recording and by optical reduction printing. Re-recording has the advantage that the frequency characteristic * Presented at the FalU 1933, Meeting of Chicago, 111. ** RCA Victor Co., Camden, N. J. 139