Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1930-1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

248 D. B. JOY [J. S. M. P. E. against the distribution. This gives a direct comparison of the amount of light obtained from these carbons at the various currents and for the distributions noted in the figure. For example, for a distribution factor from the center to the sides of 80 per cent, and from the center to the corners of 60 per cent, the regular carbon at 130 amperes provides 5700 lumens on the screen and the super-carbon at 180 amperes 7500 lumens. These values, and, to some extent, the distribution of the light, depend upon the design of the optical system4'5'6 as well as upon the light from the arc; but tfNTEK. 100 IOO 100 j/Z^J 84 32 SO coeneeses 63 so 7B IOO /OO /OO 76 74 72 tt.s 53 so.s /OO 70 FIG. 4. Light on projection screen for various distributions of the light (shutter of optical system not running). since the same optical system was used for all these measurements, the figures are directly comparable. It is evident that the supercarbon at either 160 or 180 amperes affords a distinct increase in light over the regular carbon at its highest rated current of 130 amperes. This advantage holds for the light distributions commonly encountered. These data emphasize the necessity of making comparative measurements upon the basis of the same light distribution on the screen. The effect of the distribution is better illustrated by Fig. 5 which