Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1930-1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

THE PROJECTION LIFE OF FILM* R. H. TALBOT** Summary. — With the present scarcity of raw print stock, there is need for procedures which will substantially increase the useful life of the film at hand. Prints are rendered unserviceable by damage to the perforations, by mutilation of the edges in shipment, and by abrasion of the surfaces. The means by which each of these types of film damage can be minimized (and in some cases almost entirely eliminated] will be described. The adoption of only one of these film conservation measures should double the useful life of a print. Universal adoption of all these measures could make possible several hundred bookings of a print. WEAR LIFE OP-MOTION PICTURE POSITIVE FILM There is no simple answer to the question "How many times can film be run through a projector?" It has been demonstrated many times that whereas one sample of film may become completely unserviceable after relatively few projections, another sample from the same roll of film may still be in serviceable condition after several thousand projections, depending on the conditions of operation. It is true that there are certain qualities of the film stock itself which influence its wear life. Much could be written on the relation of the physical properties of the film (tensile strength, tear resistance, brittleness, etc.) to its durability. This relation, however, is one with which the film manufacturer is primarily concerned. The user of film is more concerned with those factors which greatly influence the wear life of the film he has at hand. This paper deals with some of these factors. Relationship between Pitch of Sprockets, Pitch of Film, and Film Wear.— -If motion picture film were as dimensionally stable as steel, there would be no problem of the relative pitches of film perforations and sprocket teeth; the 2 pitches would always be equal and, consequently, several sprocket teeth would be in contact with the edges of the perforations at the same time. Actually, the pitch * Presented May 15, 1945, at the Technical Conference in Hollywood. ** Eastman Kodak Company, Kodak Park, Rochester 4, N. Y. 78