Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1930-1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

532 C. F. VlLBRANDT Vol 48, No. 6 those used for Fig. 8. It was noted throughout the investigation that tests involving the use of one projector and one batch of film showed very good reproducibility. But another series, run with a different lot of film on another projector, might show a different level of projection life under comparable conditions, even though the shape of the curves remained unchanged. These differences are due to variations in alignment of film on the sprocket, history of the film, condition of tooth surfaces, etc. Although there are not enough experimental points to define the shape of the curves with any great accuracy, it WEDGING ON OCCURS o I NO TENSION ON DRIVE SPROCKET X 13 OZ TENSION ON HOLD-BACK SPROCKET SERIES: B-4-5e.7 PROJECTOR A + 1.5 +1.0 1-0.5 0 -0.5 -I.O I.S PERCENT DEVIATION OF PITCH OF FILM FROM PITCH OF SPROCKET FIG. 7. Relationship between the per cent deviation of the film pitch from the holdback sprocket pitch and number of projections that produce film [breakdown. appears that longest film life is obtained when the pitch of the film is somewhat shorter than that of the drive sprocket. Accordingly, the use of a drive sprocket with a pitch longer than that of the film is indicated. These findings are in agreement with the theoretical conditions discussed earlier and with the results on 35-mm intermittent sprockets (which are drive sprockets) presented by Talbot3 at the Hollywood meeting in 1945. When the pitch of the film is greater than that of the drive sprocket (Case 1), the film wedges on the entering tooth, severely straining the perforations. As the difference between the pitch of the film and the sprocket becomes less and less, this "wedging-on" decreases and the life of the film increases. This same effect was observed for film