Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1930-1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

Nov. 1947 INTERMITTENT MECHANISMS 411 present type of film trap would give the film constant acceleration during the first half of the pull-down and constant deceleration during the last half of the pull-down and yet would not impose a net pull of more than one pound on the film. Let the film be given a constant acceleration of 5000 feet per second per second, the same as the peak acceleration of the Geneva. Then the acceleration curve of the film as compared with that of the Geneva would be as shown in Fig. 3. It can be seen from Fig. 3 that giving the -j .5 Sir * .8 |«0 5,000 Si t, 5,000 il 30 60 PULL DOWN (DEGREES) PULL DOWN (DEGREES) A B FIG. 4. A, Travel, velocity, and acceleration of the film. B, Pull on the film caused by acceleration and film-trap drag. film constant acceleration amounts to chopping off the dotted portion of the Geneva acceleration curve and using it to fill in the cross-hatched portion of the constant film-acceleration curve. The pull-down angle is thus reduced and since the maximum acceleration of the film has not been increased there is no increase in the stress on the film. The reduction in the pull-down angle can be computed from the equation S = Vi of where -5 = — ^5 — = 1/a the height of a frame of film a = 5000 ft /sec2 or 60,000 in. /sec 2s /2X 0.748/2 ^ = \ 60,000 ~ sec 9/2 = 360 X 0.0035 30' 1/24 60° pull-down angle.