Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1930-1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

1949 PHOTOGRAPHIC DEVELOPERS 275 These two absorbancies fix the point X on Fig. 2, which corresponds to an Elon concentration of 2.24 grams per liter and a hydroquinone concentration of 1.47 grams per liter. ANALYSIS OF USED DEVELOPERS Extraction of Elon and Hydroquinone with Ethyl Acetate Preliminary investigations showed that Elon and hydroquinone could be completely extracted from a developer solution at pR 8.0 to 8.5 by the use of a solvent such as ethyl acetate. Ethyl acetate was chosen because of its low toxicity, small fire hazard, and its relatively low absorbancy in the region of 270 to 290 millimicrons. Extraction of Oxidation Products Hydroquinone monosulfonate, quinhydrone, quinone, and Elon monosulfonate were selected as compounds that exist or would be converted into compounds that might exist in a used developer solution.12 A mix was prepared containing 3.88 grams per liter of sodium hydroquinone monosulfonate and no Elon or hydroquinone. The absorption curves were determined before and after extraction as shown in Fig. 3, curves A and B. Curve B has been adjusted to compensate for the dilution brought about by the pH. adjustment that was necessary to insure complete extraction. It is concluded from the curves A and B in Fig. 3 that the amount of hydroquinone monosulfonate extracted is negligible. The small difference between the curves may possibly be due to the presence of a small amount of hydroquinone in the sodium hydroquinone monosulfonate. In this study, this practice was followed for all curves obtained after extraction. 240 260 280 3OO 320 with and Wavelength mp Fig. 3 — Extraction study hydroquinone monosulfonate hydroquinone. A, hydroquinone monosulfonate. B, solution A after extraction. C, solution A with hydroquinone added. D, solution C after extraction.