Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers (1930-1949)

Record Details:

Something wrong or inaccurate about this page? Let us Know!

Thanks for helping us continually improve the quality of the Lantern search engine for all of our users! We have millions of scanned pages, so user reports are incredibly helpful for us to identify places where we can improve and update the metadata.

Please describe the issue below, and click "Submit" to send your comments to our team! If you'd prefer, you can also send us an email to mhdl@commarts.wisc.edu with your comments.




We use Optical Character Recognition (OCR) during our scanning and processing workflow to make the content of each page searchable. You can view the automatically generated text below as well as copy and paste individual pieces of text to quote in your own work.

Text recognition is never 100% accurate. Many parts of the scanned page may not be reflected in the OCR text output, including: images, page layout, certain fonts or handwriting.

1949 PHOTOGRAPHIC DEVELOPERS 277 no Elon or hydroquinone. The absorption curves of this mix before and after extraction are shown in curves A and B, Fig. 6. There is some change in curve shape but in view of the close agreement at 270 and 290 millimicrons, it is probable that only a very small error, if any, would be introduced into the analysis of Elon and hydroquinone by this difference. Elon (2.00 grams per liter) was then added. Curve C, Fig. 6, shows the resulting absorption curve. The sample was then extracted. Curve D, Fig. 6, shows that the Elon was extracted quantitatively in the presence of Elon monosulfonate. From the above results obtained in the extraction studies of hydroquinone monosulfonate, quinone, and Elon monosulfonate, the extraction of a used tank sample with ethyl acetate would remove only Elon and hydroquinone. In the case of quinhy drone (i.e., semiquinone-type compounds) , however, approximately half of the material present is probably extracted as hydroquinone. Procedure 280 30O 320 Wavelength m/i Fig. 5 — Extraction study with quinone and hydroquinone. A, quinone. B, solution A after extraction. C, solution A with hydroquinone added. D, solution C after extraction. Pipet a 25-milliliter sample of the used developer into a 125-milliliter separatory funnel and add 3 drops of phenolphthalein. Add drop wise 7 normal sulfuric acid until the indicator turns colorless. (The resulting solution should have a pB. of 8.0 to 8.5.) Record the volume of acid added. Extract three times with 25-milliliter portions of water-saturated ethyl acetate (75 milliliters altogether), discarding the ethyl acetate layer each time. Dilute 1.00 milliliter of the extracted developer with 100 milliliters of pH 5 acetate buffer and determine the absorbancy at 290 and 270 millimicrons. Correct these absorbancies for the volume change by using the following formula : (absorbancy) (25 + ml 7N H2SO4) (25) corrected absorbancy.